Showing posts with label climate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate. Show all posts

Monday, February 15, 2010

Global Warming Evidence Found in the Severe Snow Storms

Development Energy and Environment
  • Severe snow supports global warming
    With some climate denialists in Washington citing a severe winter as evidence the long-term trend of man-made global warming and further catastrophic climate change is a fraud, a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research says more severe snow is further evidence of global warming. Warmer oceans mean more water vapor hovering over the surface, which results in more snowfall for coastal cities.National Public Radio (2/15) LinkedInFacebookTwitterEmail this Story
  • Scientists examine climate change effects on ecosystems
    Tracing the fortunes of hundreds of plants and animal species within an ecosystem can help determine the effects of climate change and provide insight into the genesis of biological events. Researchers in Britain and the Netherlands have found evidence to suggest predators are able to adapt better than their prey further down the food chain. TIME (2/14) LinkedInFacebookTwitterEmail this Story
  • Other News

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

World Public Gives China, US Low Marks on Climate Change: Hu Jin Tao, Obama Prepare to Talk Together

Go to Printer Friendly Version...   Email to a friend...

As Hu Jin Tao, Obama Prepare to Meet, World Public Gives China, US Low Marks on Climate Change

November 11, 2009
With President Barack Obama on his way to meet his Chinese counterpart in Beijing for talks on global climate change and a range of other issues, a poll by WorldPublicOpinion.org shows that publics in more than half of 20 nations disapprove of the way China and the United States are dealing with global warming.
(Photos: Pete Souza/White House Photo, Office of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom)
The poll asked respondents to grade China and the US on several dimensions. China gets poor marks for how it handles human rights--on average 52% say China does not respect human rights while just 36% say it does. The US does better, with 50% saying it is respectful and 38% it is not.
People around the world regard both superpowers as cooperative, but they also see both countries, especially the US, as using the threat of military force to coerce other nations.
Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao are expected to focus on climate change, economic concerns, and nuclear issues related to Iran and North Korea when they meet Nov. 16 and 17. The climate change question is of particular importance in the run-up to December's conference in Copenhagen, where 192 countries will attempt to conclude a new treaty on climate change. All eyes will be on China, the world's leading emitter of greenhouse gases, and the United States, which long held that distinction.
The WPO poll, conducted during April and May, finds that people in 11 nations disapprove of how [China] is "dealing with the issue of climate change." Clear majorities in six nations -- France (74%), Britain (73%), Germany (72%), the United States (69%), South Korea (69%), and Egypt (58%) -- are disapproving, along with pluralities is five other nations. Only in Pakistan (93%), Nigeria (69%), Kenya (64%), and Indonesia (55%) do majorities approve.
Likewise, majorities in six nations disapprove of the US handling of global warming--Egypt (68%), Britain (65%), France (62%), Pakistan 62%), Turkey (56%), and Germany (56%) --, as do pluralities in five. Nigeria, Kenya, South Korea, India and Indonesia are the only countries where majorities express approval.
Across the 20 nations polled, approval of China's record on climate change is somewhat lower than for the US. On average, 34% approve of China (42% disapprove) while 39% approve of the US (41% disapprove).
WorldPublicOpinion.org conducted the poll of 20,349 respondents in 20 nations that comprise 63 percent of the world's population. This includes most of the largest nations--China, India, the United States, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Russia--as well as Mexico, Chile, Germany, Great Britain, France, Poland, Ukraine, Kenya, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan, and South Korea. Polling was also conducted in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau. Not all questions were asked to all nations. The margins of error range from +/-3 to 4 percentage points. The surveys were conducted across the different nations between April 4 and July 9, 2009.
WorldPublicOpinion.org, a collaborative project involving research centers from around the world, is managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) at the University of Maryland.
Throughout the poll, some groups of countries consistently favored one superpower and were critical of the other. Most notably, people in most Muslim countries gave China positive ratings and the US negative ratings. Among European countries, the US tended to rate high and China low. Kenya and Nigeria hold consistently positive views of the two superpowers, and Turkey has consistently negative views of both.
China and the United States are both seen as cooperative. Asked "if you think each is or is not generally cooperative with other countries," an average of 59% responded positively with regard to the US, and 53% for China.
On a nation-by-nation basis, the US is judged cooperative by 15 nations and not cooperative by four nations. China is seen as cooperative by eleven nations and uncooperative by seven.
At the same time many nations see these big powers as using "the threat of military force to gain advantages." This is especially true of the US: all nations polled, including the US itself, sees the US this way--on average 77%.
Views of China are less sharp: on average 46% say China does the same, while 41% say it does not. Ten nations say China uses military threats, eight say it does not. Among its neighbors majorities see China as threatening in South Korea (75%), and India (54%) and views are divided in Indonesia.
An area in which people around the world judge China considerably more harshly than the United States is respect for human rights. Majorities in nine countries say China does not respect human rights -- especially France (88%), Germany (88%), South Korea (87%), the US (86%), Britain (86%), and Poland (80%). However, seven, say China does respect human rights: especially Pakistan (91%), Nigeria (77%), and Kenya (67%).
The United States respects human rights in the view of 12 nations, especially. Majorities who disagreed were found in 6 nations, especially the Muslim nations of Pakistan (79%), Turkey (70%), Egypt (68%), and Iraq (60%), but also Mexico (61%).
Asked overall whether China or the US "is playing a mainly positive or negative role in the world" views are mixed. On average the split is dead even for the US, with 40% of respondents overall seeing a positive role and an identical number seeing a negative one. The overall positive response for China is higher, 44%, but still short of a majority, while 34% respond negatively.
Only in Kenya, Nigeria and South Korea do clear majorities say that both China and the US play a positive role in the world. A Majority in Turkey sees both superpowers playing negative roles.
Despite tense relations, Taiwanese views of China are not as negative one might expect. Large majorities believe China uses the threat of military force to gain advantages (70%) and does not respect human rights (76%). However slightly more than half (51%) say that China is playing a mostly positive role in the world. The same number agrees that China is mostly cooperative with other countries in the international arena.
Publics in China's special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau have very favorable views of Chinese policies. Overwhelmingly majorities agree that China is playing a mainly positive role in the world (81% Hong Kong, 81% Macau) and that China usually cooperates with other countries (85% Hong Kong, 89% Macau). Roughly two-thirds of both publics reject any notion that China uses its military power to intimidate other countries (68% Hong Kong, 69% Macau). A slight majority in Macau (51%) and a plurality in Hong Kong (45%) support China's actions in combating climate change.
The exception is on human rights. A large majority in Hong Kong (62%) say China is not respectful of human rights while views in Macau are mixed with many declining to answer.

Funding for this research was provided by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Calvert Foundation.
Share article on:

  Twitter                      Facebook
  Digg                        del.icio.us
  StumbleUpon          Newsvine


Go to Printer Friendly Version...   Email to a friend...

Friday, August 21, 2009

MeatFree Movement Addresses Climate Change: Website Unites International Petitions



Please be patient, content production is underway....much more to come.
Do you have an article that might help others realize the many benefits of the organic veggie lifestyle? Please email us with the link and why you think it should be included on this list and we'll consider posting your submission.
Download in PDF Form

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

MeatFree Movement Addresses Climate Change: Website Unites International Petitions

Los Angeles, California – August 20, 2009– Taking action to halt climate change just got easier. The MeatFree movement has gone global with the help of a unique website. MeatFreePetition.com gathers and links various nations’ petitions that urge governments to support at least one meat-free day a week. This allows individuals concerned about climate change to show their support by signing petitions and sharing with friends worldwide.

Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock are among the most serious and significant contributors to global warming. Animal agriculture is responsible for 14-18 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, more than all vehicle emissions and other forms of motorized transportation.1

Other facts about the impact of meat production on climate change include:

- Meat production results in nitrous oxide and methane emissions -- more potent greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide.1,2
- Global meat production more than doubled since 1970 and is projected to double again by 2050.1
- Pasture and feed demands of large-scale meat production promote deforestation.2
- The livestock industry uses disproportionate amounts of land, fresh water, and energy, and is a major cause of water pollution worldwide.1,2
- The livestock sector is one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global.1


Recently, the civic government in Ghent, Belgium set a precedent by declaring a vegetarian day one day each week to help reduce the city’s carbon footprint. The Chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, has recommended a weekly meat free day as a simple yet effective way to prevent climate change: "If you eat less meat you would be healthier and so would the planet ... it would help the global community enormously because the entire meat cycle is very, very intensive in terms of carbon dioxide emissions." In 2007, Dr. Pachauri and the IPCC won the Nobel Peace Prize for their work on environmental and climate change issues.

Other jurisdictions supporting vegetarianism or meat-free days to halt climate change include Sweden, Germany, Britain’s National Health Service, and Cincinnati, Ohio. Similar initiatives are being developed in many other countries. In addition to government participation, organizations, businesses and individuals are getting involved. For example, Sir Paul McCartney is leading and promoting Meat-Free UK and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health endorses Meatless Monday USA. These initiatives raise awareness, encourage individual action and promote the many benefits of a plant-based diet for preserving the environment and protecting human health.

The creator of MeatFreePetition.com, Leron Rabinowiz, hopes many people will visit the website to sign petitions in advance of the next major international climate change meeting in Copenhagen (December 2009). "These petitions will help support decision makers to include meat free days as an effective policy tool to include in future climate change treaties. By uniting concerned individuals, we offer everyone a way to take responsibility and support government action to halt climate change."

News contact:

Leron Rabinowiz
info@MeatFreeMovement.org
1.818.921.4845
P.O. Box 8398
Van Nuys, CA 91409
www.MeatFreePetition.com


Sources and additional information:
1Steinfeld et al. (2006) Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Rome: UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
2McMichael, A., Powles, J., Butler, C., Uauy, R. (2007) Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. The Lancet. Sept. 13, 2007
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meatless_Monday
http://www.meatlessmonday.com/history/
http://www.vegetarisme.be/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=767
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1053270/Everyone-meat-free-day-week-tackle-climate-change-says-UN.html